2. Assess to what extent does the logical problem of evil succeed? (12)
2. Assess the view that of the types of evil and suffering, moral rather than non-moral makes the existence of God less probable. (12)
2. Assess the significance of the view that 'without God there is no problem of evil, and anything is permissible.' (12)
2. Assess the implications of the success of the logical problem of evil. (12)
2 Assess the strengths of the claim that the logical problem of evil succeeds. (12)
2. Assess the extent to what extent does the evidential problem of evil challenge belief? (12)
2 Assess the strenghts of the problem of evil and suffering. (12)
2. Assess the credibility of the nature of God given the challenge to religious belief posed by the inconsistency between Gods and evils existence. (12)
2 Assess the weakness of claim . (12)
2 Assess the strengths of the claim that 'suffering challenges belief in the existence of God. (12)
2. Assess the extent to which Mackies idea of the inconsistent traid is successful. (12)
2. Assess the significance of Hume and Mackie’s ideas in relation to the problem of evil and suffering. (12)