2 Assess the strengths of inductive reasoning about religious experience. (12)
2 Assess how far conclusions about God from religious experiences can successfully be inferred from the link between appearances and how things really are. (12)
2. Assess the debate between Copleston and Russel on religious experience as an argument for the existence of God. (12) Sams 2016
2. Assess to what extent can religious experience be viewed as a proof for the existence of God. (12)
2. Assess how religious experience might be challenged by philosophy and by science. (12)
2. Assess the key ideas of testimony and credulity associated with the argument for the existence of God based on religious experience. (12)
2. Assess the value of testimony to religious experience. (12)
2. Assess the significance of Swinburne’s ideas on religious experience as an argument for the existence of God. (12)
2. Assess the persuasiveness of the argument from religious experience as a proof for the existence of God. (12) 2020 Paper Q
2. Assess the credibility of testimony and credulity associated with the argument for the existence of God based on religious experience. (12)
2 Assess the weakness of Hicks pluralist argument form religious experience for the existence of God. (12)
1 Explore the strengths of John Hicks religious experience argument for the existence of God. (8)
2. Assess the extent to which Dawkins critique of religious experiences is successful. (12)
2 Assess the significance of Micheal Persinger's work for the argument from religious experience. (12)
2 Assess how it is the case that sensory experiences, the 'God helmet, 'and complexity of interpretations undermine argument from religious experience. (12)
2 Assess the issue of the complexity of interpretations as relating to the argument from religious experience. (12)
2 Assess the claim that the issues raised about probability and proof as relating to the argument from religious experience fail to successfully challenge it. (12)
2 Assess the implications of the nature of God being transcendent and immanent, and limitations of language for the argument from religious experience. (12)
2 Assess issues of lack of uniformity of experiences as a weaknesses of the religious experience argument for the existence of God . (12)