Inductive Reasoning
A Posteriori
Inductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning
A Priori
Empiricism
Teleological Argument
Design Qua Purpose
Design Qua Regularity
Beneficial Order
Evolution
St. Thomas Aquinas (1225CE – 1274CE)
William Paley (1743CE – 1805CE)
Frederick Tennant (1866CE – 1957CE)
David Hume (1711CE – 1776CE)
Richard Dawkins (1941CE – Present)
Summa Theologiae by St. Thomas Aquinas
Natural Theology by William Paley
Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion by David Hume
The Teleological Argument (also known as the Design Argument) is an inductive and a posterior argument that attempts to prove the existence of God on the basis that the world appears to have been designed by an intelligent being
The Teleological Argument (also known as the Design Argument) is an inductive and a posterior argument that attempts to prove the existence of God on the basis that the world appears to have been designed by an intelligent being
Immanuel Kant: It can be supported by empirical evidence
EXAMPLE: Whales migrate from Alaska to warming climates to reproduce. This begs the question of how the nonrational whales know to do this? The principle that non-rational beings are being guided by an intelligent designer can be supported by a sound analogy
ANALOGY: Aquinas uses the analogy of an arrow (a non-rational object) reaching a target. It does this because it is guided by the archer who fired it. Likewise, life is being guided by an intelligent designer
▪ This analogy appears sound as it does parallel how animals act by instincts without using rational though
David Hume: We cannot accurately assess the beneficial order of the world
▪ Hume argued that to assess if there was a beneficial order in our world, we would need to compare it to a world without a beneficial order
▪ However, the world is unique so we cannot compare it
David Hume: The Design Argument anthropomorphises God
▪ Hume argued that to compare God to a human designer limits God’s qualities to that of a human
▪ He argues that just as there may be multiply human designers, there may also be multiple Gods.
▪ Likewise, a human designer can create something and die and so it could also be that God designed the world and died.
The most famous Design Argument is William Paley’s ‘Watchmaker Analogy’ in his book Natural Theology
▪ He used the analogy of finding a watch on a health and argued that the complexity, regularity and purpose of it suggests design
▪ Paley argued that when we looked at the universe, it too appeared complex, regular and with a purpose
▪ Therefore, Paley concluded that just as the watch was evidence of a watchmaker, so too is the world evidence of a world-maker
Richard Swinburne: There are lots of empirical examples to support Paley’s Analogy
o EXAMPLE: Natural Laws and the orderly nature of the world as evidence supporting Paley’s argument as it shows regularity and order
▪ Swinburne notes that science rather than criticising the argument has instead shown just how orderly the natural world is
F.R. Tennant: You could add beauty as another feature of design to strength Paley’s argument
▪ F.R. Tennant argued that along with purpose and regularity, you could add beauty as an indicator of something being designed
▪ You cannot explain why the world is so beautiful if there is no designer crafting it
Richard Dawkins: Darwinian Evolution is more convincing
▪ In ‘The Blind Watchmaker’, Dawkins argued that complexity and regularity can be explained better by natural selection and evolution
ANALOGY: Douglas Adams used an analogy of a puddle believing that the hole was made to fit it because it fitted it perfectly
Richard Dawkins: We see the world through purposecoloured spectacles
▪ Dawkins argued that people want to see purpose in the world even if there isn’t any (he says we look at the world through ‘purpose-coloured spectacles’)
EXAMPLE: People will read meaning into things all the time when they are in fact just coincidences
J.S. Mill : The Problem of Suffering
▪ In ‘Nature and Utility’, J.S. Mill argued that if a God did design the world then suffering in the world means that God isn’t a very good designer
Some philosophers
Section A
Examine ideas about analogy in the design argument for the existence of God.
Assess the strengths of the ontological argument for the existence of God.
Section B
3a Clarify the ideas illustrated in this passage about deign qua purpose.
3b Analyse the implications for the teleological argument.
Section C
Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the teleological argument for the existence of God.