3b Analyse the view that the Ontological Argument is a successful proof for the existence of God. (20) 2019 AS Paper Q
3b Analyse the view that the Ontological Argument is the most persuasive argument for the existence of God. (20)
3b Analyse the significance of the view that the ontological argument depends on logical fallacies that cannot be overcome. (20)
3b Analyse the weakness of using deductive reasoning, and evidence in understanding of concept ‘God’ as an analytic proposition in debates about Gods existence. (20)
3b Analyse the view that the concepts of aseity, necessary existence used in definitions of ‘God' are succesful when arguing about Gods existence. (20)
3b Analyse the credibility of the view that Gaunilo’s criticisms of the ontological argument the most effective. (20)
3b Analyse the strengths of Gaunilo's critique of the ontological argument. (20)
3b Analyse the claim Kant’s criticisms of the ontological argument are more convincing than Gaunilo’s. (20)
3b Analyse the weaknesses of Kant's criticisms of the the Ontological Argument. (20)
3b) Analayse the importance of the claim that the ontological argument as a proof of Gods existence does make Gods existence probable. (20)
3b Analyse the relevance of the claim that existence can be treated as a predicate. (20)
3b Analyse the claim 'the ontological argument is weak. (20)
3b Analyse the the key objections to the ontological argument for G-d’s existence. . (20)
3b Analyse the strengths and weakness of Malcome and Plantinga's modern forms of the ontological argument. (20)
3b Analyse the strengths and weakness of Bertrand Russel's challenges to the ontological argument (20)