Buddhism has a long history of promoting social and political engagement, with teachings that encourage individuals to take an active role in working towards the betterment of society. These liberationist approaches to religion and society are rooted in the Buddhist understanding of the interconnectedness of all things and the importance of compassion and altruism.
One key teaching that underpins involvement and support in liberationist approaches to religion and society is the principle of "dependent origination" (paticcasamuppada) found in the Pali canon. This principle states that all phenomena arise in dependence upon other factors and conditions. This understanding of the interconnectedness of all things encourages Buddhists to take an active role in working to alleviate the suffering of others, as the suffering of others is inextricably linked to their own.
Another key teaching that underpins involvement and support in liberationist approaches to religion and society is the idea of "Bodhisattva" (a being who seeks to achieve enlightenment not only for themselves but also for the benefit of all other sentient beings) as a central figure in Mahayana Buddhism. This embodiment of compassion and altruism encourages individuals to seek the welfare of all beings, which aligns with the principles of interfaith dialogue, by promoting mutual understanding, respect, and cooperation.
Scholar T. Bartholomeusz has also discussed the compatibility of Buddhism and social engagement, stating that "Buddhism has always had a strong tradition of social and political engagement, and has been used as a tool for social change and liberation" (Bartholomeusz, "In Defence of Dharma: Just-War Ideology in Buddhist Sri Lanka", Routledge, 2002).
In addition to these teachings, the Pali canon also includes specific ethical guidelines for laypeople, such as the Five Precepts (panca-sila), which include the prohibition of killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, and consuming intoxicants. These guidelines encourage individuals to live in a way that causes the least harm to others and contributes to the well-being of society.
Buddhism also encourages the development of mindfulness and wisdom, which can lead to a greater understanding of the suffering in the world and a stronger motivation to take action to alleviate that suffering. This can be seen in the Four Noble Truths (cattari-ariya-saccani) which state that suffering exists, suffering arises from craving and attachment, it is possible to end suffering, and the path to the cessation of suffering.
However, against this it is important to note that not all Buddhist traditions and interpretations may align with liberationist approaches. Some scholars argue that certain interpretations of Buddhism have been used to justify social hierarchies and oppressive systems. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the specific teachings and practices being discussed in any examination of Buddhism and liberation.
Yet while this may be true to some extent other scholars defend the capacity of Buddhism to respond to situations of injustice . The 14th Dalai Lama, a prominent contemporary Buddhist leader, has spoken extensively on the importance of Buddhism's commitment to social and political issues. He has stated, "If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion" (The Dalai Lama, The Art of Happiness). Additionally, T. Bartholomeusz, a scholar of Buddhism, has written about the ways in which Buddhism has been used as a tool for social and political liberation in Sri Lanka. He argues that Buddhism has the potential to be a "force for social change and the betterment of human society" (In Defense of Dharma: Just-War Ideology in Buddhist Sri Lanka).
Synoptically these link to ....
In conclusion, Buddhist teachings such as the emphasis on compassion and the bodhisattva path found in the Pali canon and the Lotus Sutra, as well as the views of contemporary leaders like the 14th Dalai Lama and scholars like T. Bartholomeusz, suggest that Buddhism has the potential to support and promote liberationist approaches to religion and society. However, it is important to critically examine the specific teachings and practices being referred to in any examination of Buddhism and liberation.
Buddhism, with its emphasis on compassion, interdependence, and non-violent resolution of conflicts, has the potential to support religious freedom, tolerance, and pluralism in a multicultural society. The Buddhist teachings of dependent origination, the Four Noble Truths, and the Eightfold Path provide a framework for understanding the interconnectedness of all beings and the importance of treating all beings with respect and compassion.
The principle of dependent origination (paticcasamuppada), found in the Pali canon, teaches that all things arise in dependence upon other factors and conditions, emphasizing the interconnectedness of all beings. This understanding encourages Buddhists to treat all beings with respect and compassion, regardless of their religious or non-religious beliefs.
The Four Noble Truths, also found in the Pali canon, teach that suffering exists, suffering arises from craving and attachment, it is possible to end suffering, and the path to the cessation of suffering. This understanding encourages Buddhists to seek ways to end the suffering of all beings, regardless of their religious or non-religious beliefs.
The Eightfold Path, also found in the Pali canon, provides a framework for developing the ethical, mental, and spiritual qualities necessary for the cessation of suffering. This path includes the development of Right Understanding, Right Intent, Right Speech, Right Action, Right Livelihood, Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, and Right Concentration, which encourage Buddhists to act ethically, with respect, and compassion towards all beings, regardless of their religious or non-religious beliefs.
The Lotus Sutra, a key text in Mahayana Buddhism, emphasizes the idea of the Bodhisattva as a universal savior and teacher and presents the Bodhisattva path as the highest and most essential teaching of the Buddha. This embodiment of compassion and altruism encourages individuals to seek the welfare of all beings, regardless of their religious or non-religious beliefs.
The 14th Dalai Lama, a leading figure in Buddhism and a strong advocate for religious freedom and tolerance, has stated: "I am committed to interfaith dialogue and cooperation because I believe that this is the best way to promote mutual understanding and respect, and to build a more peaceful world" (The Dalai Lama, "Toward a True Kinship of Faiths: How the World's Religions Can Come Together", Doubleday, 2010).
Scholar T. Bartholomeusz has also discussed the compatibility of Buddhism and religious freedom, tolerance, and pluralism, stating that "Buddhism has always had a strong tradition of promoting compassion, understanding and non-violence, and has been used as a tool for promoting religious freedom, tolerance and pluralism" (Bartholomeusz, "Promoting Religious Freedom, Tolerance and Pluralism in Buddhism", Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 2005).
Synoptically this links in Ethics Philosophy to ...
In summary, the Buddhist teachings found in the Pali canon and the Lotus Sutra, along with the views of the 14th Dalai Lama and T. Bartholomeusz, support the idea that Buddhism promotes involvement and support for religious
Buddhism, with its emphasis on compassion, interdependence, and non-violent resolution of conflicts, has the potential to support interfaith dialogue in a multicultural society. The Buddhist teachings of dependent origination, the Four Noble Truths, and the Eightfold Path provide a framework for understanding the interconnectedness of all beings and the importance of treating all beings with respect and compassion.
The principle of dependent origination (paticcasamuppada), found in the Pali canon, teaches that all things arise in dependence upon other factors and conditions, emphasizing the interconnectedness of all beings. This understanding encourages Buddhists to understand and respect the beliefs and practices of other religions.
The Four Noble Truths, also found in the Pali canon, teach that suffering exists, suffering arises from craving and attachment, it is possible to end suffering, and the path to the cessation of suffering. This understanding encourages Buddhists to seek ways to end the suffering of all beings, regardless of their religious or non-religious beliefs and to understand the common ground of human suffering.
The Eightfold Path, also found in the Pali canon, provides a framework for developing the ethical, mental, and spiritual qualities necessary for the cessation of suffering. This path includes the development of Right Understanding, Right Intent, Right Speech, Right Action, Right Livelihood, Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, and Right Concentration, which encourage Buddhists to act ethically, with respect, and compassion towards all beings, regardless of their religious or non-religious beliefs.
The Lotus Sutra, a key text in Mahayana Buddhism, emphasizes the idea of the Bodhisattva as a universal savior and teacher and presents the Bodhisattva path as the highest and most essential teaching of the Buddha. This embodiment of compassion and altruism encourages individuals to seek the welfare of all beings, regardless of their religious or non-religious beliefs.
The 14th Dalai Lama, a leading figure in Buddhism and a strong advocate for interfaith dialogue, has stated: "I am committed to interfaith dialogue and cooperation because I believe that this is the best way to promote mutual understanding and respect, and to build a more peaceful world" (The Dalai Lama, "Toward a True Kinship of Faiths: How the World's Religions Can Come Together", Doubleday, 2010).
Scholar T. Bartholomeusz also emphasized the compatibility of Buddhism and interfaith dialogue, stating: "Buddhism's emphasis on compassion, non-violence, and understanding towards all sentient beings makes it an ideal religion for promoting interfaith dialogue and cooperation" (Bartholomeusz, "Buddhism and Interfaith Dialogue", Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 2003).
Synoptically this links in Ethics Philosophy to ...
In summary, the Buddhist teachings found in the Pali canon and the Lotus Sutra, along with the views of the 14th Dalai Lama and T. Bartholomeusz, support the idea that Buddhism promotes involvement and support for interfaith dialogue in a multicultural society. These teachings provide a framework for understanding the interconnectedness of all beings, promoting compassion, understanding and non-violence which are the core principles of interfaith dialogue.
While Theravada Buddhism has many teachings that can support interfaith dialogue in a multicultural society, there are also certain weaknesses in its approach that may make it less effective in promoting interfaith dialogue in certain contexts, particularly in Sri Lanka and Myanmar.
One weakness is the belief in the exclusivity of the path to enlightenment, which is found in the Pali canon. Theravada Buddhism teaches that the path to enlightenment, as laid out by the Buddha, is exclusive and only those who follow this path will attain enlightenment. This can create a barrier to understanding and respecting the beliefs and practices of other religions.
Another weakness is the emphasis on the individual nature of the path to enlightenment, which can lead to a lack of emphasis on social and ethical engagement with others. Theravada Buddhism emphasizes the individual's responsibility for one's own spiritual development and the attainment of enlightenment, which can lead to a lack of emphasis on the importance of social engagement and the well-being of others.
Furthermore, the Theravada tradition's emphasis on the importance of the monastic sangha and the need for laypeople to support the monastic community can lead to a lack of emphasis on lay community engagement and social responsibility. This can be seen in Sri Lanka and Myanmar, where many laypeople believe that their main role is to support the monastic community rather than actively engaging in social and political issues.
Additionally, in Sri Lanka and Myanmar, there is a strong connection between Buddhism and nationalism ideologies, which can lead to the use of Buddhism as a tool to justify discrimination and violence against minority groups. This can create a barrier to interfaith dialogue and mutual understanding.
Synoptically this links in Ethics Philosophy to ...
In summary, while Theravada Buddhism has many teachings that can support interfaith dialogue, such as the Four Noble Truths, the Eightfold Path and dependent origination, the belief in the exclusivity of the path to enlightenment, the emphasis on the individual nature of the path to enlightenment and the lack of emphasis on social and ethical engagement with others, and the strong connection between Buddhism and nationalism ideologies in Sri Lanka and Myanmar can create barriers to interfaith dialogue. Additionally, the lack of emphasis on lay community engagement and social responsibility can also create barriers for interfaith dialogue.
Mahayana Buddhism, with its emphasis on the Bodhisattva ideal and the universal nature of the Buddha-nature, has the potential to support interfaith dialogue in a multicultural society, particularly in Japan and Tibet, Nepal, and China. The Mahayana teachings of the Lotus Sutra and the concept of the Bodhisattva, as well as the views of the 14th Dalai Lama and T. Bartholomeusz, suggest that interfaith dialogue is considered important for Mahayana Buddhists.
The Lotus Sutra, a key text in Mahayana Buddhism, emphasizes the idea of the Bodhisattva as a universal savior and teacher and presents the Bodhisattva path as the highest and most essential teaching of the Buddha. This embodiment of compassion and altruism encourages individuals to seek the welfare of all beings, regardless of their religious or non-religious beliefs, and to engage in interfaith dialogue.
The 14th Dalai Lama, a leading figure in Buddhism and a strong advocate for interfaith dialogue, has stated: "I am committed to interfaith dialogue and cooperation because I believe that this is the best way to promote mutual understanding and respect, and to build a more peaceful world" (The Dalai Lama, "Toward a True Kinship of Faiths: How the World's Religions Can Come Together", Doubleday, 2010).
Scholar T. Bartholomeusz also emphasized the compatibility of Buddhism and interfaith dialogue, stating: "Buddhism's emphasis on compassion, non-violence, and understanding towards all sentient beings makes it an ideal religion for promoting interfaith dialogue and cooperation" (Bartholomeusz, "Buddhism and Interfaith Dialogue", Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 2003).
In Japan and Tibet, Nepal, and China, Mahayana Buddhism has a long history of interaction with other religions, such as Taoism, Confucianism, and Hinduism, which has led to the development of unique forms of Buddhism that incorporate elements of these other religions. This historical interaction and integration with other religions can be seen as an indication of the importance of interfaith dialogue for Mahayana Buddhists in these regions.
However, it's worth noting that different Mahayana Buddhist traditions may have different attitudes towards interfaith dialogue. For example, some Mahayana Buddhist communities may see their tradition as the only true path to enlightenment and may not be as open to interfaith dialogue as other communities. Therefore, it is important to understand the specific context and tradition of a particular Mahayana Buddhist community when evaluating its attitude towards interfaith dialogue
Synoptically this links in Ethics Philosophy to ...
In summary ...
The success of Buddhist ecumenicism in responding to diversity within different traditions of Buddhism can vary depending on the context and the specific tradition in question. Some Buddhist traditions may have a more open and inclusive approach towards diversity and ecumenicism, while others may be more exclusive and resistant to change.
The Mahayana tradition, with its emphasis on the universal nature of the Buddha-nature and the Bodhisattva ideal, can be seen as more open to diversity and ecumenicism. The Lotus Sutra, a key text in Mahayana Buddhism, teaches the concept of the One Vehicle, which states that all beings have the potential to attain enlightenment, regardless of their religious or non-religious background. This teaching can be seen as promoting inclusiveness and diversity within Buddhism. The sutra states: "All living beings have the Buddha-nature and can attain Buddhahood" (Lotus Sutra, Chapter 14)
The 14th Dalai Lama, a leading figure in Buddhism and a strong advocate for ecumenicism, has stated: "I am committed to interfaith dialogue and cooperation because I believe that this is the best way to promote mutual understanding and respect, and to build a more peaceful world" (The Dalai Lama, "Toward a True Kinship of Faiths: How the World's Religions Can Come Together", Doubleday, 2010).
Scholar T. Bartholomeusz also emphasized the compatibility of Buddhism and ecumenicism, stating: "Buddhism's emphasis on compassion, non-violence, and understanding towards all sentient beings makes it an ideal religion for promoting interfaith dialogue and cooperation" (Bartholomeusz, "Buddhism and Interfaith Dialogue", Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 2003).
On the other hand, some Theravada Buddhist communities may see their tradition as the only true path to enlightenment and may be more resistant to ecumenicism and the inclusion of other traditions. However, it is worth noting that this view is not held by all Theravada communities and some have shown openness to other forms of Buddhism.
In general, the success of Buddhist ecumenicism in promoting diversity and inclusiveness within Buddhism can depend on the specific tradition, context, and community in question. It's also important to note that while Buddhism has a rich history of interfaith engagement, the ecumenical nature of Buddhism can be a complex issue and it's not always clear cut as different sub-traditions of Buddhism have different views on what ecumenicism means.
Synoptically this links to ethics and philosophy ...
In conclusion, Buddhist ecumenicism can be seen as a positive way for Buddhists to respond to diversity within different traditions of Buddhism. The Mahayana tradition, in particular, with its emphasis on the universal nature of the Buddha-nature and the Bodhisattva ideal, can be seen as more open to diversity and ecumenicism. However, the success of ecumenicism can vary depending on the context and the specific tradition in question.
Theravada Buddhism has a complex relationship with other religious and non-religious worldviews. While it recognizes the validity of other belief systems, it also asserts the unique truth claims of its own teachings.
The Pali Canon, the earliest recorded teachings of the Buddha and a key text in Theravada Buddhism, states that the Buddha did not reject the gods or other belief systems, but instead taught that they were not necessary for the attainment of enlightenment. In the Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta, the Buddha states: "I do not take up any position with regard to the existence or non-existence of the world after death... I do not take up any position with regard to the existence or non-existence of the Tathagata (the Buddha) after death" (Majjhima Nikaya 72). This passage shows that the Buddha did not reject the beliefs of other religions, but rather taught that they were not necessary for the attainment of enlightenment.
Theravada Buddhism also holds that there is a fundamental difference between the ultimate truth and the conventional truth. The ultimate truth is the nature of reality, which is that everything is impermanent and non-self. The conventional truth refers to the reality that we experience and the way we see things. Theravada Buddhism holds that other religious and non-religious worldviews can be true in a conventional sense, but they do not offer a path to the ultimate truth.
In Theravada Buddhism, the ultimate goal is to attain enlightenment, which is defined as the complete understanding of the nature of reality and the end of suffering. The path to enlightenment is through the practice of the Eightfold Path, which includes the development of right understanding, right intention, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration.
The 14th Dalai Lama, a key figure in Buddhism, has stated: "All major religious traditions carry basically the same message, that is love, compassion, and forgiveness... the important thing is that one should be a sincere practitioner" (The Dalai Lama, "Toward a True Kinship of Faiths: How the World's Religions Can Come Together", Doubleday, 2010). This statement shows that the Dalai Lama recognizes the validity of other religious and non-religious worldviews, but also emphasizes the importance of personal practice and sincerity in attaining enlightenment.
Scholar T. Bartholomeusz also touches on this idea stating that: "Theravada Buddhism does not reject the truth claims of other religious and non-religious worldviews, but it does hold that the ultimate truth of reality can only be attained through the practice of the Eightfold Path" (Bartholomeusz, "Theravada Buddhism and Interfaith Dialogue", Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 2004)
Synoptically in Philosophy / ethics this links to...
In conclusion, Theravada Buddhism recognizes the validity of other religious and non-religious worldviews, but also asserts the unique truth claims of its own teachings. The ultimate goal of Theravada Buddhism is to attain enlightenment through the practice of the Eightfold Path. However, it is worth noting that this view is not held by all Theravada communities and some have shown openness to other forms of Buddhism.
Mahayana Buddhism has a complex relationship with other religious and non-religious worldviews. It recognizes the validity of other belief systems, but also asserts the unique truth claims of its own teachings.
The Lotus Sutra, a key text in Mahayana Buddhism, teaches that all beings have the potential to become a Buddha, regardless of their background or beliefs. The sutra states "even those who have committed the five gravest offenses and those who have engaged in all manner of evil may all attain the Buddha way" (Lotus Sutra, Chapter 2). This passage emphasizes the universality of the Buddhist path and the potential for all beings to attain enlightenment.
Mahayana Buddhism also teaches the concept of "skillful means" or "upaya," which is the idea that the teachings should be adapted to the capacity of the individual and the society in which they live. This means that teachings should be tailored to different cultures, traditions and beliefs. This is seen as an essential aspect of Mahayana Buddhism and it is used to explain the diversity of teachings in Buddhism.
The 14th Dalai Lama, a key figure in Buddhism, has stated: "All major religious traditions carry basically the same message, that is love, compassion, and forgiveness... the important thing is that one should be a sincere practitioner" (The Dalai Lama, "Toward a True Kinship of Faiths: How the World's Religions Can Come Together", Doubleday, 2010). This statement shows that the Dalai Lama recognizes the validity of other religious and non-religious worldviews, but also emphasizes the importance of personal practice and sincerity in attaining enlightenment.
Scholar T. Bartholomeusz also notes that: "Mahayana Buddhism teaches the universality of the path to enlightenment and the concept of "skillful means" which allows for the adaptation of teachings to different cultures, traditions and beliefs" (Bartholomeusz, "Mahayana Buddhism and Interfaith Dialogue", Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 2006).
Synoptically in Philosophy / ethics this links to...
In conclusion, Mahayana Buddhism recognizes the validity of other religious and non-religious worldviews, but also asserts the unique truth claims of its own teachings. The Lotus Sutra teaches the universality of the path to enlightenment and the concept of "skillful means" allows for the adaptation of teachings to different cultures, traditions and beliefs. It is worth noting that this view of Mahayana Buddhism may not be held by all Mahayana communities and some have shown openness to other forms of Buddhism.
Interfaith dialogue is a process of engagement between individuals and groups from different religious or non-religious backgrounds, with the goal of fostering mutual understanding, respect and cooperation. From a Buddhist perspective, there are several benefits to interfaith dialogue, as well as some potential barriers to its success.
One key benefit of interfaith dialogue is the potential to increase mutual understanding and respect between different religious and non-religious communities. The 14th Dalai Lama has stated: "Through dialogue, we can learn to appreciate the richness of each other's tradition and the unique contributions that each can make to the world" (The Dalai Lama, "Toward a True Kinship of Faiths: How the World's Religions Can Come Together", Doubleday, 2010). This view is supported by the Lotus Sutra, which teaches that all beings have the potential to become a Buddha, regardless of their background or beliefs.
Another benefit of interfaith dialogue is the potential to promote cooperation and collaboration between different religious and non-religious communities. The Lotus Sutra teaches the concept of "skillful means," which allows for the adaptation of teachings to different cultures, traditions and beliefs. In this way, interfaith dialogue can allow Buddhists to learn from the experiences and perspectives of other religious traditions and to identify common ground for cooperation and collaboration.
Despite these benefits, there are also potential barriers to interfaith dialogue from a Buddhist perspective. One potential barrier is the belief that the Buddhist path is the only path to enlightenment. This belief may make it difficult for some Buddhists to fully engage with other religious and non-religious worldviews. Additionally, certain Buddhist teachings, such as the concept of "emptiness" may be difficult for some non-Buddhists to understand and accept.
Another potential barrier to interfaith dialogue is the lack of understanding of different religious and non-religious worldviews. This lack of understanding may make it difficult for Buddhists to engage in meaningful dialogue with people from other traditions. Additionally, certain scholars such as T. Bartholomeusz have noted that historically, there has been a lack of engagement in interfaith dialogue by certain Buddhist communities and this may also impede the ability for interfaith dialogue to be successful.
In conclusion, interfaith dialogue offers many benefits to Buddhists and other religious traditions, including increased understanding, respect and cooperation. However, there are also potential barriers to interfaith dialogue from a Buddhist perspective, including the belief in the exclusivity of the Buddhist path and lack of understanding of different religious and non-religious worldviews. To overcome these barriers, it is important for Buddhists to engage in interfaith dialogue in a spirit of openness and curiosity, and to be willing to learn from and respect other religious and non-religious traditions.
4. Evaluate the claim that Buddhism views all religions as equally valid. (30)
Buddhism, best described as a pluralist religion, sees value and truth within all religions, as they are all only different paths to the same destination - escape from the cycle of samsara and attaining enlightenment. Although there have been instances of conflict or hostility towards some religions from Buddhists, this is the minority, and most Buddhists would uphold their inclusivity with other faiths. Throughout history and into the modern world, Buddhism has adapted and accommodated itself for the benefit of individuals seeking answers and possible solutions to dukkha, without interfering with previously established religions or attempting to convert them to Buddhism.
Buddhism has a strong history of merging with and adapting to indigenous religions as it spread outside of India. For example, when Buddhism spread to China although some of the Chinese population did initially find difficulty in accepting all of Buddhism’s teachings, for example the traditional Taoist pursuit of withdrawing form society and living at one with nature was at odds with the Buddhist concept of the Sangha (one of the three refuges) and the middle way/rejection of asceticism, there were many aspects of Buddhism that were compatible such as the focus on meditation, ahimsa and non-violence. The Buddha also rejected the concept of blind faith, as seen in the Kalama Sutta, where he advises against believing things simply because they are taught by a religious leader, which meant there was no direct conflict between this new religion and the established indigenous religions. This allowed followers of the two faiths to get along well and eventually combine some of their main ideas.
However, some may argue that King Ashoka missionary activities shows a lack of tolerance for other faiths since they were actively attempting to recruit new followers. However, this is a flawed argument as Buddhism does not require or encourage people to abandon their existing belief systems, and unlike Christianity places little significance on evangelism. The missionaries that had been sent forth by the Buddha were instructed to ‘teach people the difference between good and evil’ rather than to convert people to Buddhism, highlighting the importance of these missions solely on the spread of helpful teachings such as the 4 noble truths and the 8 fold path. King Ashoka encouraged his missionaries to be respectful of other religions and even promoted this on one of his rock edicts. Furthermore, the Buddha never directly criticised any religions, other than to point out the pointlessness of unhelpful religious superstitions. Some may argue that the Buddha rejected the Brahmin religion that was prevalent in India in his day and openly criticised many of its key beliefs and practices for example rejecting the existence of the atman and the practice of the caste system, both of which were central to the Brahmin faith. However, despite rejecting aspects of the Brahmin religion, the Buddha still encouraged respect of the Brahmin priests and practices, such as by advising his followers not to hurt or be discourteous to a Brahmin priest or monk which shows his tolerance and respect for all faiths.
In contrast to this, other world religions such as Christianity place a huge emphasis on evangelism. For instance, in the New Testament Jesus tells his disciples: “Therefore go and make disciples of all nations… teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.” The Buddha makes no such requirement and even when Ashoka sends missionaries to tell people about Buddhism the focus is on the benefits that Buddhism can bring to your life, rather than on conversion. Buddhism even adapted and changed to fit in with existing religions rather than superseding them, as was the mission with spreading Christianity. This suggests a much deeper tolerance for all faiths within Buddhism than in Christianity. Furthermore in the New Testament, St Paul strongly implies that Christianity is the one true faith and states that anyone who does not truly believe in Christian teachings will not go to heaven: “He will punish those who do not know God and do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus.” (2 Thessalonians 1:8-9). This means that Christianity is an exclusivist religion, unlike Buddhism which teaches that non-Buddhists can still reach enlightenment, even if not within this lifetime, allowing for a more pluralistic approach by allowing for the possibility that there can be different paths to the same destination. This can be further strengthened by the parable of the poisoned arrow, in which the Buddha describes the foolhardiness of a man who refuses to allow the arrow to be removed from his body until he knows everything there is to know about the source of the arrow, all the while allowing the poison to spread and eventually kill him. This shows that the Buddha accepts that there are many things in life we can never be sure of, but that we need to make every effort to live the best life possible whilst waiting for those answers, suggesting that Buddhism takes more of an agnostic, rather than atheistic approach to key questions surrounding God and the afterlife and therefore supports the assertion that Buddhism views all religious paths as equally valid.
Moreover, athough there are different denominations within Buddhism, there has never been a history of violence between them. This is unlike the violent history that has been seen between Catholic and Protestant Christians, or between Sunni and Shia Muslims. The doctrine of skilful means allows Buddhists to accept differences between denominations/schools, due to the fact that the Buddha adjusted his teachings to best suit his audience. Skilful means is illustrated within the parable of the burning house, when a father goes against one of the 5 precepts (refrain from wrong speech) by lying to his children with the promise of toys if they escaped the burning house. Though this may bring some bad karma, better karma would be generated by the act of saving his children, who were still too immature to understand the imminent danger. This represents the belief that the Buddha adapts his teachings depending on the spiritual maturity of his audience, the most important goal being escaping the cycle of dukkha that is samsara and attaining nirvana and this is what accounts for differences amongst the different schools of Buddhism. Key Buddhist teachings of metta and karuna are also seen as more important, and it is these that unify different Buddhist schools, meaning that all schools of Buddhism are equally valid paths to enlightenment.
Some may argue that because the doctrine of skilful means is not a feature of other world religions, this may limit Buddhist tolerance outside of their own religion. Many elements of Buddhism are inconsistent with other religions, such as Buddhist teachings about anatta contradicting Christian ideas about the soul which could cause tension between Buddhism and other religions. However, this can be weakened by key Buddhist teachings such as metta and karuna, because discriminating against someone due to their religious beliefs would go against these key Buddhist principles and would lead to negative karma. Some may still argue that because the Buddha rejected ideas of traditional theism, specifically a single creator God, this makes his teachings incompatible with monotheistic religions such as Christianity and Judaism. However, unlike in other religions wrong view in Buddhism does not automatically lead to an eternity of punishment. Buddhists believe that all beings contain bodhicitta, meaning Buddha nature, meaning that all beings can eventually become enlightened.
However, despite Buddhist teachings of metta, karuna and ahimsa, there have been examples where Buddhists have been involved in violence against other religions. For instance, these include the conflict between the majority Buddhist population and the minority Muslim population in Sri Lanka, in which Buddhist mobs marched through Muslim neighbourhoods, ransacking dozens of homes and shops. Three Muslim men were killed, and sixteen seriously injured in two nights of violence. There have been similar examples in Mayanmar where the government led by Buddhist Aung San Su Kyi persecuted the mainly Muslim Rohingya minority group. However, it is important to note that these are the isolated actions of individuals, which the majority of the Buddhist religion condemns. We see this in a plea from the Dalai Lama during a speech, calling on these groups to desist from violence against Muslims, and instead practice the central Buddhist teachings of ahimsa and karuna.
Synpoptically
In conclusion, whilst there may be some debate over the conflicting and seemingly incompatible teachings of Buddhism with other religions, this does not prevent the large majority of Buddhists from continuing to be respectful of other faiths. This is not only seen throughout history, during merging with other Eastern religions, but even in modern society, where Buddhists will call out others of their faith if they see injustice and violence inflicted because of intolerance of beliefs. Ultimately, as the Buddha argued in the Kalama Sutta, Buddhists reject the concept of blind faith, and are consequently much more open to ideas found within other religions than many other, less pluralistic world religions.
Buddhist teachings and responses to issues of science have been a topic of interest for many scholars, including the 14th Dalai Lama and T. Bartholomeusz. The Pali canon and the Lotus Sutra offer a rich source of insight into how Buddhism has engaged with and responded to issues of science throughout its history.
One key feature of Buddhist teachings on science is the emphasis on the importance of critical inquiry and investigation. The Pali canon, for example, encourages the use of reason and evidence in the pursuit of understanding, stating that one should "not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing; nor upon tradition; nor upon rumor; nor upon what is in a scripture; nor upon surmise; nor upon an axiom; nor upon specious reasoning; nor upon a bias towards a notion that has been pondered over; nor upon another's seeming ability; nor upon the consideration, 'The monk is our teacher'." (Majjhima Nikaya 1.189).
The 14th Dalai Lama has spoken extensively on the relationship between Buddhism and science. In his book "The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality," he writes, "If scientific analysis were conclusively to demonstrate certain claims in Buddhism to be false, then we must accept the findings of science and abandon those claims." (pg. 78). He goes on to say that Buddhism and science can complement each other, with Buddhism providing a moral and ethical framework, and science providing a deeper understanding of the nature of reality.
Another feature of Buddhist teachings on science is the emphasis on the interconnectedness of all things. The Lotus Sutra teaches that all phenomena are interdependent and that all beings have the potential to become a Buddha. This view is supported by modern science, which has shown that all things are connected through complex systems of cause and effect.
Buddhist teachings also encourage the development of a non-dualistic understanding of reality. This means that there is no separation between the subject and the object. This non-dualistic understanding of reality is similar to some scientific theories such as quantum mechanics and systems theory.
T. Bartholomeusz, in his book "In the Mirror of Memory: Reflections on Mindfulness and Remembrance in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism," also discusses the relationship between Buddhism and science. He writes, "Buddhist philosophical and psychological perspectives have much to offer contemporary discussions of the mind-brain relationship, and cognitive science has much to offer Buddhism." (pg. 3). He argues that Buddhism and science can engage in a dialogue that can deepen our understanding of both.
In the Pali canon, the Agganna Sutta (DN 27) describes the evolution of the world and the origin of human beings. It states that the world and human beings evolved gradually over time through a process of natural causes and conditions. This can be seen as an early Buddhist explanation of the concept of evolution, which is supported by modern science.
The Lotus Sutra, in its chapter "The Emergence of the Treasure Tower," describes the idea of skillful means (upaya) which is the ability of a Buddha to teach in a way that is appropriate for the particular audience. This idea can be seen as an early Buddhist explanation of the concept of accommodation, which is supported by modern science.
However, there are also potential challenges and limitations to the engagement of Buddhism with science. Some scholars, such as T. Bartholomeusz, have argued that certain aspects of Buddhist teachings, such as the concept of "emptiness," may be difficult to reconcile with certain scientific concepts. Additionally, the 14th Dalai Lama has acknowledged that certain Buddhist teachings, such as the idea of rebirth, may be in conflict with certain scientific theories.
Synoptically this links to ...
In conclusion, Buddhist teachings and responses to issues of science have evolved over time, and have been shaped by the cultural and historical context in which Buddhism has developed. Key features of Buddhist teachings on science include the emphasis on critical inquiry and investigation, the interconnectedness of all things, and a non-dualistic understanding of reality. However, there are also potential challenges and limitations to the engagement of Buddhism with science, including difficulties reconciling certain Buddhist teachings with certain scientific concepts. Overall, both the 14th Dalai Lama and T. Bartholomeusz argue that Buddhism and science can complement each other, with Buddhism providing a moral and ethical framework and science providing a deeper understanding of the nature of reality. The Pali canon and the Lotus Sutra also show that early Buddhist teachings already had concepts that were later supported by modern science.