2. Assess the extent of the importance of inductive reasoning for the success of the Cosmological argument. (12)
2. Assess the importance a posteriori types of arguments for Gods existence. (12)
2. Assess the importance the idea of EITHER movement, OR cause and effect, in the cosmological argument for the existence of God. (12)
2 Assess the view that the universe requires a cause and that God is the best explanation. (12)
2. Assess the importance of contingency and necessity existence in cosmological arguments that show God exists. (12) 2018 Paper Q
2 Assess the significance of the issues around the interpretation of experience in cosmological arguments. (12)
2. Assess the significance of the problem of infinite regress in the cosmological argument. (12)
2. Assess the credibility of the Principle of sufficient reason as an approach to successfully showing that God exists. (12)
2. Assess the extent to which he principle of sufficient reason provides an explanation for G-d’s existence. (12)
2 Assess the strengths of claim the Kalam version of the cosmological argument for G-d’s existence is sucessful . (12)
2 Assess the view that the Kalam Cosmological Argument fails to prove God exists.
2 Assess the strengths of the Kalam version of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God. (12) 2018 AS Q
2 Assess the strengths of the Kalam version of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God.. (12)
2 Assess the weakness of claims that explanation, and interpretation of experience should led us to reject an actually infinite regress. (12)
2 Assess the importance of the idea of the universe as a brute fact and the problem of infinite regression. (12)
2. Assess the persuasiveness of cosmological arguments as a proof for the existence of God. (12)
2 Assess the strengths of the claim that the Cosmological argument can on provide probability not proof of Gods existence. (12)
2 Assess the strengths of claim the challenges to the cosmological argument are successful. (12)
2 Assess the weaknesses of claim the challenges to the cosmological argument are successful. (12)
2 Assess the significance of the Kantian claim the impossibility of metaphysical knowledge of Gods existence drawn from observation of contingency. (12)
2 Assess how it is the case that as Kant concludes that the Cosmological Argument is irrelevant as it depends on the ontological argument. (12)
2 Assess the credibility of the Hume's claim if we can explain the parts of the universe we do not have to explain the whole. (12)
2 Assess how far it is the case that its more helpful to say an explanation of the parts of the universe is sufficient to explain the whole. (12)