3b Analyse the significance of the claim that the problems of caring for the natural world provide an impossible challenge to the practice of stewardship.. (20)
3b Analyse the importance of conservation for religious ethical perspectives. (20)
3b Analyse the appropriateness and value of employing religious perspectives in debates on the environment (20)
3b Analyse the claim that secular approaches to environmental issues are of more help than religious approaches. (20)
3b Analyse the weaknesses of the claim that Utilitarianism is not the best approach to environmental ethics?' (20)
3b Analyse the importance of Kantian and virtue ethics to Environmental issues of significant disagreement and debate. (20)
3b Analyse the importance of deontological moral imperatives as an approach to caring for the environment. (20)
3b) Analayse the weakness of claim that relativist ethics are the best approach to the environmen. (20)
3b Analyse the extent to which religious teachings on the environment and the Gaia hypothesis compatible. (20)
3b Analyse the strenghs and weakness of religious approaches to the environment. (20)
3b Analyse the strenghs and weakness of secular approaches to the environment. (20)
3b Analyse the imoprtance of the claim animal wealfare is not a signficant area of ethical concern. (20)
3b Analyse the significance of Gaia theory and James Lovelock as a signficant figure within the enviornmental movement. (20)
3b Analyse the significance of Deep Ecology and Arnold Naess as a signficant figure within the enviornmental movement. (20)