Ineffability
Passive
Noetic
Transient
Mystical
Conversion
Corporate
• Principle of Testimony
• Principle of Credulity
• Defeaters
• Naturalist explanation
William James (1842CE – 1910CE)
St. Teresa of Avilla (1515CE – 1582CE)
Rudolf Otto (1869CE – 1937CE)
Richard Swinburne (1934CE – Present)
Sigmund Freud (1856CE – 1939CE)
John Hick (1922CE – 2012CE)
Michael Persinger (1945CE – 2018CE)
Richard Dawkins (1941CE – present)
The Varieties of Religious Experience by William James
The Idea of the Holy (1968) By Rudolf Ott0
The Future of an illusion By Sigmund Freud
The Coherance of theism Richard Swinburne
Neurological Bases of God beliefs By Michael Persinger
The God Delusion By Richard Dawkins
Religious experiences are claims of an overwhelming awareness of the presence of God
Famously, William James concluded that religious experiences shared four common factors: Ineffability (inexpressible), Transient (temporary), Passive (they happen to you) and Noetic (they reveal some universal truth)
Moreover they are used as evidence that God exists
In his book “Is there a God?”, Richard Swinburne argued that religious experiences should be interpreted as genuine and therefore considered evidence for the existence of God
Furthermore, he puts forward two principles which we should use to judge there the reliability of testimonies of religious experience
The Principle of Credulity: This states that we should accept our experiences as genuine unless a defeater is present
The Principle of Testimony: This states that we should accept the testimony of others unless a defeater is presen
Brain Davies: Religious experiences are a type of sensory experience
Swinburne appears right that we should accept religious experiences like other experiences
ANOLOGY: We accept a bed in a room by seeing it so too we should accept God if we see him Swinburne’s Principles work in everyday scenarios
The two principles we use implicitly all the time when making judgements about ordinary situations so it seems reasonable to use them about religious experiences too Swinburne acknowledges the presence of defeaters
Sometimes defeaters cancel out the principles
EXAMPLE: He argues that you cannot accept the testimony if you have reason to believe you are being deceived.
EXAMPLE: He argues that you cannot accept your senses if you are in a situation in which you senses are unreliable (i.e. on LSD)
J.L. Mackie: Deluded people may think they are telling the truth
Mackie notes that the principle of testimony says that people don’t usually lie.
However, people can be mistaken and so testimony can be unreliable even if people aren’t deliberately lying
Caroline Franks Davis: Religious experiences require more evidence than other experiences
Davis notes that we should proportion the amount of evidence we require to believe something to how extraordinary it is
Therefore, religious experiences require more evidence that other sensory experiences because they are extraordinary
Michael Martin: You can use the principles to prove there is no God
Martin argued that an atheist could testify that they have experienced the world as Godless.
Under Swinburne’s principles we too should accept this testimony of a Godless world
In the 20th Century, Austrian Psychologist, Sigmund Freud argued that religious experiences were not genuine and could instead be better explained by a naturalist explanation such as psychology
Freud argued that the human mind was made up of the ego (your sense of self), the id (your unconscious desires) and the super-ego (you moral sense which is influenced by society).
He argued that some people when stressed are unable to cope with adult life and so they project the idea of a God who they encounter and who is controlling the world and looking after them. Freud believed religious experiences were therefore a delusion
Feuerbach: The idea of projecting a God seems reasonable
Frued based his idea of projection on ideas from Ludwig Feuerbach who argued that humans project the best human qualities onto something to worship
EXAMPLE: Actors thanking “God’ for their talent at the Oscars
People tend to have religious experiences under stressful situations
Scientific studies have found that people typically experience God under stressful situations or in near-death experiences which supports Freud’s view that people are fooling themselves to make themselves feel better
Kate Lowenthal: Not all religious experiences are projective
Lowenthal has argued that some religious experiences don’t fit with Freud’s account as they are not always done under stressful situations Michael Persinger: Neurology may explain religious experiences better than psychology
It can be argued that recent medical studies have shown that religious experiences are actually caused by a lack of oxygen to the brain not some psychological condition o
EXAMPLE: Michael Persinger was able to create religious experiences in test subjects by putting a magnetic helmet on them
Some philosophers
Some philosophers
Section A
Examine key ideas about the nature of religious experience.
Assess the debate between Copleston and Russell on religious experience as an argument for the existence of God.
Section B
3a Clarify the ideas illustrated in this passage about religious experience.
3b Analyse the view that the argument from experience fails to prove the existence of God.
Section C
Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of two challenges to the argument from religious experience.