Conflict
Compatibility
Rationalism
Empiricism
Realism
Anti-Realism:
Scientific MethodologyBig Bang
Steady State
Intelligent Design
Irreducible Complexity
Creationism
Cosmological Constant
Evolution
Gaia Hypothesis
Naturalism
Miracles
Probability
Principle of Credulity
Principle of Testimony
Charles Darwin (c.1809cE-1882CE)
Richard Dawkins (c.1941cE-Present)
OTHERS
René Descartes (c1596-1650 CE)
Ian Barbour (1923CE-2013CE)
Plato (c. 427–428 BC To c. 348–347 BC )
Aristotle (c.384 BC -322 BC )
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881-1955)
Paul Davies (c.1946-Present CE)
Micheal Behe (c.1952-Present CE)
Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225-1274CE)
David Hume (c. 1711-1776CE)
Richard Swinburne (c. 1934-present CE)
R.F. Holland (c. 1905-1284CE)
Maurice Wiles (c. 1923-2005CE)
"The Origin of Species" by Charles Darwin (1859)
"The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins (2006)
OTHERS
"Issues in Science and Religion" (1966) By Ian Barbour
"God and the New Physics" by Paul Davies (1983)
"Timaeus" and "Phaedo" by Plato
"Physics" and "Metaphysics" and "On the Heavens" By Aristotle
"Meditations on First Philosophy" (Meditationes de Prima Philosophia) and "Discourse on the Method" (Discours de la méthode)By René Descartes
"The Phenomenon of Man" ("Le Phénomène Humain") (1955) By Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
"Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution" (1996) by Micheal Behe
"Summa Theologica" and "Summa Contra Gentiles" by Thomas Aquinas
"An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding ["Of Miracles" ]" and "Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion" by David Hume
"The Concept of Miracle" (1970) By Richard Swinburne
"Against Empiricism: On Education, Epistemology and Value" (1980) by R.F. Holland
"God's Action in the World" (1986) by Maurice Wiles
Sciecne
Science
Based on methods of observation, reason and experiment
They have been repeated and tested independently
We can look at this data or trust that we could carry out these experiments ourselves
Five Key Steps
Observation
Hypothesis
Experiment
Law
Theory
Nothing has full knowledge of the world, sometimes out senses can deceive us
There is no way of knowing what is real – Descartes & Plato
Rationalism: Belief that the mind is the source of knowledge. Truth can be discovered using the power of reason
Realism: The view that there are actual facts ‘out there’ which we get right or wrong in our search for understanding
Anti-Realism: Holds that all truth is relative – something can be true for one person but not another
Adopted a method of extreme scepticism in an attempt to determine what we can know
Argued that nothing could be accepted as true knowledge unless we could clearly perceive it without any possibility that we could be mistaken
In Plato’s view, there was an absolute truth that existed, somewhere, in some sense, in reality.
He thought that truth existed, but he wasn’t sure whether or not that people would ever be able to find and recognize this truth
Science and religion are in perpetual and principal conflict
States that science and religion can both be true as long as they are kept to their separate domains.
There is common ground between both fields, perhaps in their presuppositions, methods, and concepts – they share a mutualistic relationship
Natural Theology = There is obvious (scientific) evidence in nature of God
Theology of Nature = We have scientific evidence – religion interprets this
Process Philosophy = Nature changes – this is scientifically obvious. This is due God. A God that is the source of order but he is also changeable
Big Bang
Steady State
Intelligent Design
Irreducible Complexity
Creationism
Cosmological Constant
Evolution
Gaia Hypothesis
Observed variation in species due to the environment
Those with traits that helped them survive longer passed these traits onto their offspring who also thrived
Survival of the fittest
It appeared humankind was not the supreme creation of God after all – it was an accident – chance
Humankind had not been deliberately created in a ready made form (‘In Gods image’)
Claims there are serious flaws in Darwinist Models of evolutionary theory and rather than trying to find ever more convoluted ways to explain them – it is far more obvious to look to God
For Behe the observations scientists now make are best accepted by the belief in an intelligent designer - God is in control of the evolutionary process
Argued that the world was exactly as described in Genesis
Scientists who disagree are seriously mistaken in the understanding of their data
God is the only being that has certain TRUE knowledge of what happened
Claimed there was clear evidence in the Bible that the world was created in 6 actual days (NOT an era ‘Yom’)
All animals were created by God and named by Adam – this is Biblically evident
Dinosaurs are NOT a faith test from God – they were present in creation – ‘Behemoth’
Richard Dawkins not only regards Darwinism as compatible with atheism, but that atheism is a logical outcome of evolutionary belief.
Dawkins singled out theistic religion as a virus.
Mind viruses – they are ideas that have ‘evolved’ over time – they have no evolutionary benefit but continue to exist. A group of memes is a memeplex (religion) there is no value
Palaeontologist and Catholic
He aimed to show that science and religion could live compatibility together and discoveries in one could enhance the other
Modern Physicist - Three key ideas:
Mathematics – There are mathematical patterns in the universe that point to God
Chance – The universe could not have happened by chance – it is too complex
Knowledge – Science is the how – religion is the why
Incompatible with traditional doctrine and teachings
Tries to replace important section of the Bible with new and made up ideas
Just because there are patterns doesn’t mean anything
There is no purpose to the universe
We are here as a result of randomness
Issues surrounding the definition of a miracle
Unexpected violation of natural law – that serves a higher purpose – has religious significance
Bible – Jesus (Feeding Five Thousand, Walking on Water etc)
Modern – Mother Teresa
Rejected miracles – they were beyond the grounds of reasonable belief
No sensible person could really believe a miracle had happened
We should consider all the evidence
Three ranks of miracle:
1. Something done by God that nature can never do
2. Something done by God that nature can do – but not in that sequence or connection
3. Something done by God which is usually done by nature but is beyond the natural principles
Some philosophers
Some philosophers
Section A
Examine ideas about .
Assess the debate between .
Section B
3a Clarify the ideas illustrated in this passage about .
3b Analyse the implications for l from this passage
Section C
4 Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of
Section A
Examine ideas about .
Assess the debate between .
Section B
3a Clarify the ideas illustrated in this passage about .
3b Analyse the implications for l from this passage
Section C
4 Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of