3b Analyse the significance of the inductive reasoning for the success of the Cosmological argument. (20)
3b Analyse the credibility of a posteriori types of arguments for Gods existence. (20)
3b Analyse the credibility of the view that Aquinas arguments from movement, as well as cause and effect are still useful in proving Gods existence. (20)
3b Analyse the view that the universe requires a cause and that God is the best explanation. (12) 2021 Q
3b Analyse the importance of contingency and necessity existence in cosmological arguments that show God exists.. (20)
3b Analyse the significance of the issues around the interpretation of experience in cosmological arguments. (20)
3b Analyse the weaknesses of the claim the cosmological argument fails given the issues around the interpretation of experience. (20)
3b Analyse the significance of the problem of infinite regression in the cosmological argument . (20)
3b) Analyse the extent to which he principle of sufficient reason provides an explanation for G-d’s existence. (20)
3b Analyse the relevance of the Principle of sufficient reason as an approach to successfully showing that God exists. (20)
3b Analyse the strenghs and weakness of the view that the Kalam version of the cosmological argument for G-d’s existence is sucessful. (20)
3b Analyse the implications of the view that the Kalam version of the cosmological argument for G-d’s existence is sucessful. (20)
3b Analyse the extent to which the Csomological Argument is undermined by its weaknesses. (20)
3b Analyse the view that the Cosmological Argument fails to prove the existence of God. (20) 2017 AS Q
3b Analyse the view that the Cosmological Argument is a successful proof for the existence of God. (20)
3b Analyse the view that the Cosmological Argument is a successful proof for the existence of God. (20)
3b Analyse the view that 'The cosmological argument cannot prove the existence of God.’ (20)
3b Analyse he credibility of Russell's idea of the universe as a brute fact in debates about infinite regress. (20)
3b Analyse the significnance of the Kantian claim of the impossibility of metaphysical knowledge of Gods existence drawn from observation of contingency. (20)
3b Analyse the credibility of the Hume's claim if we can explain the parts of the universe we do not have to explain the whole.. (20)