Who wrote the Gaia hypothesis?
2. What is deep green ecology?
3. What do stewardship and dominion mean?
4. What is biodiversity?
5. What are conservation ethics?
6. What is the anthropocentrism?
Scroll Down for Answers
What is environmental Ethics?
Why is environmental Ethics a moral issue?
What is the problem of waste management?
What is animal welfare and why is it an ethical issue?
What is Stewardship?
What should be the Impact of Christian ideas of stewardship?
What does Singer say about animal welfare and stewardship?
What is conservation?
What is sustainability?
What has been the pollical / legal response to environmental issues?
What did Luther say about the environment?
What did Lindsey White to criticise Stewardship?
What is was did Aristotle and Aquinas think about Animal welfare and protection:
What category did Marshal suggest this fell into?
What did Anderson say about environmental ethics?
What did Paradise say about environmental ethics?
What did Linzey say about animal welfare?
What did Peter Singer say about Animal Welfare?
What category did Marshal suggest this fell into?
What does the catholic church today say about environmental ethics?
What is Naess’s secular approach to environmental ethics?
What is the difference between deep and shallow ecology in Naess’s thinking?
What was the difference between bio-centric and androcentric in Naess’s thought?
How was Singer Critical of Naess’s argument?
What is Gaia theory
What is weak Gaia theory?
What is strong Gaia theory?
What did Kircher say about Strong Gaia theory
Why is Dawkins critical of Gaia theory?
Why is Gould critical of Gaia theory?
Who else is critical of Gaia theory and why?
What did Ruse say about the varied reactions to Gaia theory
What secular reasons are there to care/support the environment?
What sacred reasons are there to care/support the environment?
What reasons have scholars given to care/support the environment?
What secular reasons are there to not to care/support the environment.
What sacred reasons are there to not to care/support the environment.
What reasons have scholars given not to care/support the environment.
What does Natural Moral Law say about environmental ethics?
What does Utilitarianism say about environmental ethics?
What does Situation Ethics say about environmental ethics?
What does Virtue Ethics say about environmental ethics?
What does Kantian deontology say about environmental ethics?
What is environmental Ethics?
A form of philosophy that considers the ways humans interact with their natural environment and with nonhuman animals. This includes a moral consideration of the human approach to natural resources.
Why is environmental Ethics a moral issue?
Recycling, Global warming, Plastic waste, Pollution, Endangered species are thought moral issues for different reasons- e.g. the destruction of what is intrinsically or extrinsically valuable from religious and secular perspectives.
What is the problem of waste management?
Throwing rubbish away is essentially a waste of resources, and potentially very damaging to the environment. As such, waste management and the safe disposal of waste have massive and far-reaching consequences for the environment and are of vital importance as poor waste management contributes to climate change and air pollution, and directly affects many ecosystems and species.
What is animal welfare and why is it an ethical issue?
Animal welfare as an ethic is defined principally by reference to what it is not. In particular, the animal welfare ethic is distinguished from animal welfare science and from the utilitarianism of Peter Singer. It is explained that animal welfare can be regarded as an ideal theory of justice if it can be shown that animals are morally inferior to humans in the sense that all human interests are more important morally than all animal interests. It is argued by preference /interest Utilitarian’s like Singer that this is not the case, since it underestimates the moral importance of the interest that animals have in avoiding suffering.
What is Stewardship?
Stewardship: follows from the belief that human beings are created by the same God who created the entire universe and everything in it. To look after the Earth, and thus God's dominion, is the responsibility of the Christian.
What should be the Impact of Christian ideas of stewardship?
Impact: Christians will want to recycle/encourage sustainable projects because they will have to face God one day and explain how they looked after the earth. The earth has been gifted to humans to look after by God so by damaging the world Christians are disrespecting God.
What does Singer say about animal welfare and stewardship?
Peter Singer says ‘we should extend the circle of moral worth to animals’ he argues all sentient creatures deserve rights and we are committing the mistake of ‘speciesism’ and ‘should get of the old sanctity of life principle.’
What is conservation?
Conservation: preventing the waste of resources. Can be animals/earth/plants etc.
What is sustainability?
Sustainability: The world should be able to function in the future.
Christians will be asked by God how they left the earth for their children.
What has been the pollical / legal response to environmental issues?
Plastic bags are not free (5p min charge).
Waste must be disposed in a land fill.
Hazardous waste cannot be placed in the same place as other waste.
What did Luther say about the environment?
The return of Jesus would come after the destruction of the world
What did Lindsey White to criticise Stewardship?
He argued the ‘historic roots of our ecological crisis lay in our foundational belief in dominion that humans are the masters of the world and can do what they want with it.
What is was did Aristotle and Aquinas think about Animal welfare and protection:
Aristotle ‘Nature has made all animals for the sake of man”.
“Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything” (Genesis).
Christians have been given every animal to be used for food.
Christians should not abuse the animals God has given life to (against animal testing and using animals for food).
“The life of animals and plants is not preserved for themselves but for man” (St. Thomas Aquinas)
What category did Marshal suggest this fell into?
This is Marshals third categories of Conservationism or what Naess terms shallow ecology.
What did Anderson say about environmental ethics?
Anderson.
God-centred: Christian ethics is centred around the moral responsibility to the environment. Anthropocentric: Agape love is unconditional love for humans and the environment makes a big different to human health and life.
Bio-centric: God created a world that was good in itself so we cannot damage or punish the environment.
What did Paradise say about environmental ethics?
Scott Paradise: Revised Christians ethics:
‘All things have value’ (Stewardship and Animal welfare).
‘Man has been given responsibility on earth’ (Sustainability and conservation).
‘In producing and consuming, man finds only a small part of his humanity’ (Conservation and animals welfare).
‘Improvement in the quality of life take precedence over increased material production’ (Waste management/fossil fuels/global warming).
‘Material resources are limited and are to be used carefully and cherished’ (Fossil fuels and renewable resources).
‘Purpose of government is to regulate and plan process that will prevent the impairment of the quality of the environment (Deforestation/Animal habitats/Conservation/Endangered animals).
What did Linzey say about animal welfare?
“Since an animal's natural life is a gift from God, it follows that God's right is violated when the natural life of his creatures is perverted” (Andrew Linzey – Christian writer).
What did Peter Singer say about Animal Welfare?
We have to ‘extend the circle of moral worth to animals’ that ‘the old sanctity of life principle is dead’ that sentient creatures should be treated as having rights or we are making the mistake of ‘speciesism’.
What category did Marshal suggest this fell into?
The 1st of Marshals three categories ‘libertarian extension’ meaning we should extend the rights of humans to other sentient creatures
What does the catholic church today say about environmental ethics?
Catholic Church:
Creation has value in itself (every creature must be loved for its own sake.
Humans are dependent but responsible.
Creation reveals sin – by damaging the environment we damage our relationship with God.
Care and respect must replace greed.
Pope Frances took his official name after Francis of Assisi, and names and quotes his Canticle of the Creatures prayer as his first encyclical Laudi Si in which he argues ‘we need and environmental conversion’ and have to ‘repent’.
What is Naess’s secular approach to environmental ethics?
Naess - argued that all living things are alike in having value in their own right, independent of their usefulness to others.
They have intrinsic value and so for example, when walking on the mountainside it is not necessary to damage the plants.
The identity of a living thing is essentially constituted by its relations to other things in the world, especially its ecological relations to other living things.
If people conceptualise themselves and the world in relational terms, the deep ecologists argue, then people will take better care of nature and the world in general.
To respect and to care for my Self is also to respect and to care for the natural environment, which is actually part of me and with which I should identify.
Naess gave all being some form of intrinsic value since they all depend on each other, and so animals and plants should not be treated badly or destroyed for any reason.
What is the difference between deep and shallow ecology in Naess’s thinking?
Naess was pragmatic and developed a ‘environmental platform’ of key targets and understood that different people would join for different reasons. His metaphor of the beach and the deep suggests some are shallow committed for instrumental reasons, treating the environment as of extrinsic worth e.g. Aquinas and Mill others (like him) for its inherent worth using intrinsic thinking e.g. Bentham, Deep Incarnational and Green Theology.
What was the difference between bio-centric and androcentric in Naess’s thought?
Naess’ (like Lindsey) argues that anthropocentrism, a worldview that contains an instrumentalist view of nature and a view of humanity as the conqueror of nature, has led to environmental degradation throughout the world, and thus it should be replaced with ecocentric (ecology-centred) or biocentric (life-centred) worldviews, where the biosphere becomes the main focus of concern.
How was Singer Critical of Naess’s argument?
Peter Singer: (Responding to Lovelock) All life forms play a part in the ecosystem – we cannot give intrinsic value to sentient life forms as plant cannot be said to have true desire to flourish.
What is Gaia theory
Lovelock: Gaia theory suggests that the Earth and its natural cycles can be thought of like a living organism. When one natural cycle starts to go out of kilter other cycles work to bring it back, continually optimising the conditions for life on Earth.
Lovelock argues that humans have now pushed Gaia to her limit. In addition to filling the atmosphere with carbon dioxide, we have hacked our way through the "lungs" of the planet (the rainforests) and driven many species to extinction. He thinks we are heading for a very warm world, where only polar regions are comfortable for most life forms. Eventually, he suspects, Gaia will pull things back into check, but it may be too late for the human race.
Some people may argue that it doesn’t matter what we do to the earth since it will just be able to regulate itself (design argument). However, Lovelock is concerned that this time may have passed for humans to survive the readjustment.
What is weak Gaia theory?
"Weak Gaia" asserted that life tends to make the environment stable for the flourishing of all life. Weak Gaian hypotheses suggest that Gaia is co-evolutive. This is merely the observation that nature is a vast interconnected ecosystem of ecosystems.
What is strong Gaia theory?
"Strong Gaia" according to Kirchner, asserted that life tends to make the environment stable, to enable the flourishing of all life. This teleological view suggests either something pantheistic or theistic at work.
What did Kircher say about Strong Gaia theory
Strong Gaia, Kirchner claimed, was untestable and therefore not scientific.
Why is Dawkins critical of Gaia theory?
Biologists in particular took umbrage. Richard Dawkins argued it contradicted Darwinian evolution.
Why is Gould critical of Gaia theory?
Stephen Jay Gould dismissed it as “a metaphor, not a mechanism”.
Who else is critical of Gaia theory and why?
John Maynard Smith called the Gaia hypothesis “an evil religion”. Paul Ehrlich described Lovelock himself as “radical and dangerous”, while Robert May called him a “holy fool”.
What did Ruse say about the varied reactions to Gaia theory
Ruse, in The Gaia Hypothesis: Science on a pagan planet, attempts to show why Gaia was so warmly embraced by its lay audience and so brutally disparaged (at least at first) by its professional one gives a history of ‘natural theology’. Beginning with Plato – “the first real Gaia enthusiast” – who viewed the cosmos as a living thing endowed with soul and intelligence. And he joins the dots between Plotinus’s interconnectedness, Thomas Aquinas’s natural theology, and the scientific revolution and the mechanistic approach it inspired. He finds roots of Gaia in Darwin’s theories, in the transcendental idealism of Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Schelling, Herbert Spencer’s social Darwinism, the impassioned nature-writing of Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, and in Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring and the eco-activism of the late 20th century.
What secular reasons are there to care/support the environment?
• Earth’s systems, which sustain life, are breaking down.
• Finite natural resources are being depleted.
• Environmental damage affects animals.
• Damage to home and global warming affects the poor.
• As humans manipulate nature more than anything else, we have a duty to care for it.
What sacred reasons are there to care/support the environment?
• Not caring for the environment “disrespects God and forces the poor into greater poverty” Catholic Church.
• The concept of Stewardship means the world if God’s – so humans must care for it for God.
• Sin destroys the relationship with God – so we must not commit the sin of damaging the environment.
What reasons have scholars given to care/support the environment?
• Aldo Leopold: Our moral obligation is to water, plants and animals (or the land). – he argued from a secular view.
• Naess argued that we need to “preserve the integrity of the biosphere for its own sake’ not for human benefit – He argued from a secular view.
• Human and non-human life is valuable (humanist).
• Naess argued that all parts of the ecosystem have intrinsic value (not because they are useful to us).
• Lovelock argued that we cannot function without the ecosystem so we must look at the ecosystem as an entity in itself (Gaia) which means it must all be preserved.
• Paul Taylor – Every part of the ecosystem is “pursuing its own good in its unique way”.
What secular reasons are there to not to care/support the environment.
• The picture painted is exaggerated.
• The earth can and has remedied itself.
• Animal testing protects and developed new drugs.
• New facilities and developed have enhanced human life.
What sacred reasons are there to not to care/support the environment.
• St Thomas Aquinas “All animals are naturally subject to man”.
• “Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything” (Genesis).
• Christians have been given every animal to be used for food.
• “The life of animals and plants is not preserved for themselves but for man” (St. Thomas Aquinas).
What reasons have scholars given not to care/support the environment.
• Peter Singer argues that it is only justifiable to give intrinsic value to sentient beings as plants cannot truly be said to have the desire to flourish or have experiences.
What does Natural Moral Law say about environmental ethics?
Primary Precepts.
Preserve life – this means we cannot hurt or kill animals.
Live in society – must build a good society so we can use animals and the environment.
What does Utilitarianism say about environmental ethics?
The greatest good for the greatest number.
Use the environment for the development of humans.
But, you must think about the humans that will inhabit the earth after you.
Bentham would have been a deep ecologists and Mill a shallow ecologist.
What does Situation Ethics say about environmental ethics?
Most loving actions.
Most loving to not use the environment and animals.
More loving to test on an animal then a human.
What does Virtue Ethics say about environmental ethics?
Developed good habits.
Good person will not damage the environment.
But, golden mean – which means the environment can be used.
What does Kantian deontology say about environmental ethics?
Objective moral values and Categorical Imperatives.
Cannot use the environment for as it is morally wrong.
2nd CI concerned with humans not animals.
FOR THE ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS, SCROLL DOWN TO THE END.
1.Which of the following is NOT an example of conservation in relation to natural environments?
a. legal protection of an endangered species
b. exploitation of a finite natural resource
c. Preservation of an area of natural beauty
d. management of ocean fish stocks via quotas
2. TRUE or FALSE? ‘Stewardship’ is a word which describes the idea that human beings were created by God to rule over the earth and use its resources for their own purpose in any way that they see fit.
3. TRUE or FALSE? Some Christians (mainly in the USA) believe that it is acceptable for humans to do whatever they want to the environment as it has been given to them by God for precisely this purpose, even if pollution and other environmental damage happens as a consequence.
4. Which of the following passages that might be mentioned in a discussion about Christian teaching to do with the environment is NOT found in the book of Genesis?
a. And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
b. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
c. And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered.
d. The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it.
e. The earth is the Lord’s, and everything in it.
5. TRUE or FALSE? The Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, addressing a meeting that was attended by activists from the eco- activist movement Extinction Rebellion stated that humans have declared war on nature and put progress before the planet.
6. TRUE or FALSE? In the gospels Jesus is described as cursing a fig tree that subsequently withers. Additionally, having performed an exorcism, he grants some evil spirits that had taken possession of a man permission to enter a herd of pigs (approximately 2,000 according to Mark’s version of this incident). The pigs then rush into the sea and drown themselves.
7. TRUE or FALSE? The Biblical teaching that only humans are made in God’s ‘image’ is taken by many Christians to mean that humans have an eternal soul and animals do not.
8. TRUE or FALSE? You can’t be an atheist and believe in stewardship.
9. TRUE or FALSE? The utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham argued that humans are speciesist in their treatment of animals.
10. TRUE or FALSE? In 1822, the United Kingdom became the first country to establish legal protection for animals, in this case by passing a law aiming to prevent the cruel and improper treatment of cattle.
11. TRUE or FALSE? The 2007 Animal Welfare Act imposed more severe penalties on those found guilty of cruelty to animals. The maximum sentence is now one year in prison as a result of the passing of this law.
12. TRUE or FALSE? According to the philosopher Michael Sandel, it is reasonable to charge rhino hunters $250,000 dollars for the privilege of hunting and killing an endangered black rhino as long as the money is used for the conservation of the rest of the black rhino population.
13. TRUE or FALSE? The term ‘sustainability’ describes the current efforts to develop ‘green’ sources of energy e.g. wind and solar power.
14. Which of the following is NOT an example of a method of waste disposal?
a. Fracking
b. Incineration
c. Landfills
d. Ocean dumping
15. TRUE or FALSE? The main cause of climate change is the increased emission of greenhouse gases (mostly CO2) as a result of human activity.
16. TRUE or FALSE? The scientific evidence for climate change resulting from human activity is presently inconclusive.
17. TRUE or FALSE? The Paris Agreement at the UN Conference on Climate Change in 2015 committed the 200 signatories to keeping global temperature increases below 2.0 degrees Centigrade and to curbing and eventually reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
18. Which philosopher said, ‘‘To put it in terms a child could understand, as far as the atmosphere is concerned, the developed nations broke it. If we believe that people should contribute to fixing something in proportion to their responsibility for breaking it, then the developed nations owe it to the rest of the world to fix the problem with the atmosphere’ ?
a. Arne Naess
b. Peter Singer
c. Michael Sandel
d. James Lovelock
19. TRUE or FALSE? The term ‘shallow ecology’ describes the anthropocentric view that the environment should be preserved because humans will benefit from doing so.
20. Which of the following thinkers from within the Deep Ecology movement was the first to encourage his readers to ‘think like a mountain’?
a. Arne Naess
b. James Lovelock
c. Aldo Leopold
d. Roger Scruton
21. Who has criticized the ecocentric perspective of Deep Ecology on the following grounds?
Only persons have moral status and to be a person you have to be able to reason in a simple manner and know that you have a future. Some animals show evidence of this. So those in the wild deserve protection. So too do those animal species with a nervous system as they can feel pleasure and pain. But stalactites, mountains and plant life cannot be thought of in this way. They lack personhood and a nervous system. So the Deep Ecology movement is wrong to claim that we must ‘think like a mountain’.
a. Roger Scruton
b. Slavoj Zizek
c. James Lovelock
d. Peter Singer
22. TRUE or FALSE? A criticism of shallow ecology is that it is philosophically incoherent. This is because it is impossible for anyone to adopt a non-human view of nature as it is impossible to escape from an anthropocentric perspective.
23. TRUE or FALSE? The Gaia Hypothesis is a religious theory about how we should think about the earth.
24. Who is responsible for the Gaia Hypothesis?
a. James Lovelock
b. Slavoj Zizek
c. Roger Scruton
d. Arne Naess
25. TRUE or FALSE? A strength of the Gaia Hypothesis might be that in regarding the earth as a living organism, it makes our relationship to it more personal, and we may then be more inclined to think of it as something that needs protecting.
26. Who has criticised Lovelock’s claim that the earth is a harmonious, balanced, self-regulating organism by arguing that nature actually consists of ‘a series of unimaginable catastrophes’. Oil, which is partly made up of the remains of animal life and plant life, is an example of this.
a. Roger Scruton
b. Slavoj Zizek
c. Peter Singer
d. Aldo Leopold
27. TRUE or FALSE? More recently, Lovelock has argued that nuclear power stations should be closed down because of the potential environmental catastrophes that may result from meltdowns and radiation leaks.
28. Which philosopher argues that we should become what he calls ‘oikophiles’, people who care about their local environment?
a. Slavoj Zizek
b. Peter Singer
c. Roger Scruton
d. Michael Sandel
29. Which philosopher’s famous ‘drowning child’ thought experiment could be used to demonstrate that we do have obligations, both to people who are already suffering from the effects of climate change in other parts of the world and to future human beings who will be affected by our actions now?
a. Slavoj Zizek
b. Roger Scruton
c. James Garvey
d. Peter Singer
30. Which philosopher uses the analogy of a house buyer who fails to take out insurance against his cliff-side property eventually falling into the sea to argue that it would be reckless to do nothing about climate change now, even if we cannot be certain how much global temperatures will eventually increase?
a. Bjorn Lomborg
b. Roger Scruton
c. James Garvey
d. Peter Singer
ANSWERS
1. b – One definition of the term ‘conservation’ is ‘the protection, preservation, management, or restoration of natural environments.’
EXAM TIP: YOU MAY GET ASKED ABOUT RELIGIOUS AND/OR SECULAR APPROACHES TO CONSERVATION. THE CHRISTIAN CONCEPT OF STEWARDSHIP IS AN EXAMPLE OF A RELIGIOUS APPROACH. CONTRASTINGLY, SINGER, NAESS, LOVELOCK , SCRUTON AND ZIZEK ARE EXAMPLES OF SECULAR THINKERS. IF YOU GET ASKED ABOUT SOMETHING LIKE SUSTAINABILITY OR CLIMATE CHANGE, YOU COULD STILL DRAW ON THE SAME EXAMPLES, DEPENDING ON THE WORDING OF THE QUESTION, OF COURSE.
2. False – what is described in the question is the traditional understanding of ‘dominion’ rather than ‘stewardship’. In terms of Christian teaching, the term ‘stewardship’ is to do with the idea that everything in creation belongs to God. We are only looking after the earth’s resources for Him. Humans therefore have a duty of care to responsibly protect and preserve the natural world.
3. True – these Christians think that it doesn’t matter if we use up all the earth’s resources (like oil and gas) and wreck the environment because then God will make Judgement Day happen sooner. For them, this is what stewardship entails: dominion. Other Christians regard stewardship as involving conservation in line with their belief that humans should look after what God has given them in a caring and responsible manner.
4. e – The final quotation is from Psalms 24v1. Together with the fourth quotation, this passage supports the idea of responsible Christian stewardship. Both translations are taken from the New International Version of the Bible. The first three passages from Genesis tend to support the ‘you can do whatever you like’ notion of dominion, especially the third one, which is rarely mentioned in textbooks that look at Christian teaching about the environment. Those first three translations are taken from the older, King James version of the Bible, two of which specifically mentions ‘dominion’.
5. False – Williams is a former Archbishop of Canterbury.
6. True – The story of Noah’s Ark is also not very environmentally friendly to say the least. If the Flood was a punishment for human sin, what had all the animals done that drowned in it to deserve their fate?
7. True – This point could be cited as a weakness of Christian/religious perspectives on animal welfare and protection as it supports the ‘dominion’ view of nature that animals have no moral status. Philosophers who believed in God like Descartes and Kant additionally went on to argue that as animals lack rationality, it does not matter what we do to them. This perspective could be contrasted with that of Bentham and Singer, but also with the more modern Christian view that animals should not be treated with unnecessary cruelty and that animal species should be preserved according to the idea that stewardship implies a duty of care to them.
8. False – a secular concept of stewardship is possible. According to this idea, as mankind is the highest product of evolution and the most dominant species, this arguably entails a duty of care to the natural world that gave rise to us.
9. False – Bentham did think that – as animals experience pleasure and pain – that they were worthy of moral consideration in relation to his hedonic calculus. But it is Peter Singer who made the accusation about speciesism.
10. True
11. False – the maximum sentence is just under a year: 51 weeks.
12. False – Sandel mentions this example without giving it his seal of approval. Apparently, rhino auctions of this kind have been held with this purpose in mind that are helping to preserve and sustain the rhino population. But what Sandel says is this: ‘Whether to create a market in the hunting of endangered species depends not only on whether it increases their number but also on whether it expresses and promotes the right way of valuing them.’
13. False – Wind and solar power are examples of ‘sustainable development’. The deployment of alternative energy sources like this would make us less reliant on the fossil fuels (e.g.oil) that contribute to climate change. ‘Sustainability’ can be defined as the earth’s ability to continue supporting life. The increased use of wind and solar power contributes to sustainability, especially with regard to future generations of humanity.
14. a – Fracking is the process of drilling down into the earth before a high-pressure water mixture is directed at the rock to release the gas inside. The term ‘fracking’ refers to how the rock is fractured apart by the high pressure mixture. Fracking allows drilling firms to access difficult-to-reach resources of oil and gas. In the US it has significantly boosted domestic oil production and driven down gas prices. It is estimated to have offered gas security to the US and Canada for about 100 years, and has presented an opportunity to generate electricity at half the CO2 emissions of coal. The industry suggests fracking of shale gas could contribute significantly to the UK’s future energy needs. The Task Force on Shale Gas, an industry-funded body, has said the UK needs to start fracking to establish the possible economic impact of shale gas – saying it could create thousands of jobs. The extensive use of fracking in the US, where it has revolutionised the energy industry, has prompted environmental concerns. Fracking uses huge amounts of water, which must be transported to the fracking site, at significant environmental cost. Environmentalists say potentially carcinogenic chemicals used may escape and contaminate groundwater around the fracking site. The industry suggests pollution incidents are the results of bad practice, rather than an inherently risky technique. There are also worries that the fracking process can cause small earth tremors. Campaigners say that fracking is simply distracting energy firms and governments from investing in renewable sources of energy, and encouraging continued reliance on fossil fuels. Ocean dumping can include toxic waste that is harmful to aquatic life. For example, materials like plastic are non-degradable which means they will not be absorbed and recycled. When oceanic creatures and even birds consume plastic inadvertently, they choke on it which causes a steady decline in their population. Activists say who suffer from the plastic debris are dolphins, sharks, turtles, crabs, and sea birds, among others. The Pacific Ocean Garbage Patch is a very good example of plastic being hazardous.
15. True
16. False – the overwhelming scientific consensus is that human activity is causing global warming (where ‘warming’ refers to an overall average increase in the surface temperature of the earth) . What is uncertain is just how much warming will happen in the future. An average surface temperature increase of between 1.1 and 6.4 degrees is anticipated. One reason for scientific confidence in this area is the fact that only climate change models that combine anthropogenic with natural contributions to warming have been shown to accurately predict changes that have already been observed between the years 1860 and 2001. Although there are those who deny the reality of climate change, almost all are operating outside the scientific mainstream.
17. True
18. b
19. True – shallow ecology contrasts with ‘deep ecology’, which is the idea that everything in the natural world has intrinsic rather than instrumental value.
20. c – Arne Naess makes use of this phrase to encourage us to realize that we are part of the biosphere and therefore have a responsibility to other living things which includes thinking about the long term interests of the environment as a whole. However, it was Aldo Leopold who first coined it in his Sand County Almanac.
21. d – Note that Singer’s views about personhood and the fact that animals are deserving of moral consideration because they can feel pleasure and pain are also relevant to the topic of animal welfare and protection.
22. False – this is an additional criticism of the perspective of Deep Ecology. EXAM TIP: DON’T FORGET THAT YOU ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO KNOW THE STRENGTHS AS WELL AS THE WEAKNESSES OF THE DIFFERENT RELIGIOUS AND SECULAR APPROACHES TO ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICAL ISSUES. THESE ARE DESCRIBED IN YOUR COURSE NOTES.
23. False – James Lovelock (see answer to next question) regards his theory as scientific rather than religious. However, it does come close to recapturing the older, pagan idea of ‘mother earth’ and encourages a respect and reverence for the planet that borders on the spiritual. Plus, Lovelock describes Gaia in a manner that seems to ascribe agency and consciousness to Gaia’s actions. For example, he states that Gaia will take ‘revenge’ on us. Singer has criticised Lovelock for this, on the grounds that it is misleading to ascribe such qualities to a non-sentient being. EXAM TIP; YOU COULD POSSIBLY GET AWAY WITH INCLUDING THE GAIA HYPOTHESIS IN RESPONSE TO A QUESTION ABOUT RELIGIOUS APPROACHES TO CONSERVATION OR SUSTAINABILITY, ON THE GROUNDS THAT MODERN PAGANS HAVE ADOPTED THE THEORY (Paganism, which at one point was regularly reported as being Britain’s fastest growing religious tradition, has its roots in the pre-Christian world view that preceded the spread of Christianity to the UK). ADDITIONALLY, IN HIS BOOK GREEN PHILOSOPHY, ROGER SCRUTON STATES THAT ‘IN ITS MORE MYSTICAL FORMS, THE CULT OF GAIA COMES CLOSE TO RECAPTURING THE PAGAN VIEW OF THE EARTH AS A GODDESS, WHOSE ANIMATING PRINCIPLES RUN THROUGH ALL OF US’. THIS WOULD BE IN SPITE OF LOVELOCK’S INSISTENCE THAT HIS HYPOTHESIS IS A SCIENTIFIC ONE .
24. a – This is basically the idea that the earth itself is a massive, ‘homeostatic’ or self-regulating, biological organism. According to Lovelock, humans are not treating Gaia (i.e. the Earth) with respect and as Gaia is self-regulating, it/she may soon cause us to become extinct.
25. True – when revising at the end of Year 13, note the similarity to the Feminist theologian Sally McFague’s notion of ‘panentheism’.
26. b
27. False – Lovelock is in favour of using nuclear power as an alternative to burning fossil fuels. This is because he fears that drastic action is needed to prevent Gaia taking her ‘revenge’ on us. However, he has attracted criticism for this idea on the grounds that nuclear power stations could become targets for terrorism. And since Lovelock published his latest book ‘The Revenge of Gaia’ the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan has demonstrated the environmental damage that can be caused by accidents and damage to nuclear power stations.
28. c – Note that Scruton is sceptical about the cultivation of a global environmental ethic through international agreements and treaties because there are no penalties associated with them. and so this makes it easier for countries to cheat or renege on what they have agreed to. He thinks that instead, we need to find a way of motivating everyone to ‘do their bit’ as it were and that this can only be achieved at a local level, as people generally do care more about their immediate environment. A strength of Scruton’s theory is that he rightly draws attention to the need to motivate people to act in the first place. However, a criticism of his view is that both people and countries perhaps should be coerced into doing more. For example, a country that violates an international treaty could be punished with economic sanctions.
29. d – NOTE: this thought experiment was actually intended by Singer to motivate us to do more about people dying from disease and famine in developing countries. But it could be adapted for use in discussions about present climate change and sustainability in relation to ensuring that the earth remains habitable for future generations of human beings.
30. c – NOTE- Garvey’s thought experiment could be used to criticise Bjorn Lomborg’s view that focusing attention and resources on what he perceives as far more pressing world problems, such as AIDS, malaria and malnutrition would be more worthwhile.
More Q and A!
1. Who wrote the Gaia hypothesis?
A Gordon Brown
B James Lovelock
C Linda Lovelace
D Peter Vardy
2. What is deep green ecology?
A An approach to environmental ethics which sees all life forms as having value
B An approach to environmental ethics which sees humans and animals as having value
C An approach to environmental ethics which sees only humans having value
D An approach to environmental ethics which has been nicely coloured in
3. What do stewardship and dominion mean?
A Looking after the world for ourselves
B Looking after the world for God
C Looking after the world and ruling it
D Looking after the world and having responsibility for it
4. What is biodiversity?
A Lots of bio’s
B The variety of living things on earth
C The animals on earth
D The plants and animals
5. What are conservation ethics?
A Use, allocation, protection and exploitation of the natural world for humans
B Use, protection, preservation of all life
C Protection from extinction
D Breeding programmes in zoos
6. What is the anthropocentrism?
A Looking after ants
B An approach which puts human interests above others
C An approach which puts humans at the top of the animal hierarchy
D An approach that puts human interests last
Multiple-choice Quiz – Answers
1.
A No
B Yes
C No
D No
2.
A Correct
B No, this is not quite right
C No, this is shallow ecology
D No!
3.
A No
B No
C No
D Yes
4.
A No!
B Yes
C Nearly right, try again
D Nearly right, try again
5.
A Yes
B No
C No
D No
6.
A No!
B Correct
C Nearly correct, try again
D No; try thinking about the opposite to this answer