Soul
Immortality
Rebirth
Tripartite Soul
Substance Dualism
Cartesian Dualism
Malevolent Demon
‘Cogito Ego Sum’
Monism
Materialism
Behaviourism
Plato
Aristotle
John Hick
Rene Descartes (1596CE – 1650CE)
Richard Dawkins (1941CE – Present)
Burrhus F Skinner (1904CE – 1990CE)
Principles of Philosophy by Rene Descartes
Consciousness: An Introduction (2010) by Susan Blackmore
The Concept of Mind (1949) by Gilbert RylE
The Mind/Body problem is the issue regarding personal identity and specifically what is the “real you”
There are essentially two schools of thought: Dualism and Monism
Dualist thought can be traced by to Platonic ideas of the existence of two realms - a physical realm of appearances and a spiritual realm of the Forms
However, modern day Dualism is usually more associated with Substance Dualism from Rene Descartes (also called Cartesian Dualism)
Dualism argues that you are made up of two substances: the Body and the Mind/Soul. – they accept the idea of life after death
Soul and body are separate
The body is material, temporary
The soul is the essential immaterial aspect
The soul is temporarily united with the body – but can leave to move on
Tripartite view of the soul – Reason, Emotion & Desire
Descartes’ Malevolent demon analogy is convincing
ANALOGY: Imagine you are being tricked by a demon. The physical world (including your body) could be an illusion. However, your thoughts cannot be an illusion. Therefore, your mind is different to your body Numerous thought experiments support the idea that the mind can exist separately to the body
There are lots of body-swap movies which scholars have used to suggest that the idea of the mind is the real you and is separate from the body
EXAMPLE: Freaky Friday
Michael Lacewing: Perceiving things as separate doesn’t make them separate
Lacewing says that Descartes’ Dualism arguments basically come down to people saying they can imagine a mind without their body but this o
ANALOGY: You might perceive Clark Kent and Superman as different but they aren’t Descartes fails to explain how the mental and physical interact
Dualism never really goes into how something mental can interact with the physical world The mind is really just a physical brain ▪ Another critique is that the idea of the mind is really just a physical brain and so is not a mental thing at all o
COUNTER-RESPONSE: Property Dualism is a different version of Dualism which avoids this problem by arguing that the brain has both physical and mental properties
Monism (or materialists) argues that there is only one you
that human beings are only made of one substance – the physical body – they reject the idea of death
The most common form of Monism is Materialism which argues that all there is it the physical world. This view is associated with Richard Dawkins and the scientific community
Another form of Monism is Behaviourism and this is supported by B.F. Skinner who argued that when people talk about mental states they are really just talking about the physical behaviour people display
Believed the soul was a substance – an essence
The physical body is in a continuous state of change – but the ‘substance’ remains the same
The continuing identity or essence remains the same – this is the soul
The soul and the body cannot be separated
His view did not allow for the idea of the soul to live on after death
Richard Dawkins: There is lots of scientific evidence to support Monism
MRI scans show different parts of the brain lighting up when people think about different things and this suggests that the mental is really just physical processes in the brain
Furthermore, experiments on the brain have removed parts of the brain and found that it means people lose specific abilities such as communication and again this suggests the mental is really just a physical process
Materialism doesn’t recognise that we have personalities
Twins with the same DNA brought up by the same families have different personalities which implies that there must be something more to us than just our physical bodies Behaviourism ignores our internal thoughts
Behaviourists argue that saying you are happy is just a case of displaying happy behaviour
But this is clear wrong as people can act happy and feel sad
Key Words
Reincarnation: literally means ‘becoming flesh again’ - humans are reborn time and time again
Samsara: The circle of life
Atman: The soul
Moksha: The ‘Destruction of Delusion’ and escape from the circle of life and reincarnation
Karma: The natural laws of cause and effect
How it Works
Hindus believe that the soul passes through a cycle of successive lives (samsara) and its next incarnation is always dependent on how the previous life was lived (karma). If they are fortunate enough they will escape samsara and enter Moksha
Past Lives Stories
Stevensons work documentimng 1000s of stories of children especially remembering specefic past lives stories.
Rejected by many religions (Christianity, Islam, Judaism) who teach about salvation, judgement and resurrection of the body – it is incompatible with many western religions
Causes issues with personal identity – there is no reason to identify the person living now to someone who has died – it is impossible to for two individuals to be the same person
Is Karma fair? Should you be punished for a past life crime? It is unjust for people to suffer for past faults they cannot remember
Key Terms
Resurrection: strictly understood says that this very body will be resurrected, brought back from the dead.
Recreation: a duplicate of this body, perhaps made of exactly the same kind of matter, perhaps made of something different, will be created.
Biblical Foundation - Jesus
St. Paul, in I Corinthians 15, talks of ‘resurrection’ of the body, but then says that the body that is resurrected is a heavenly body, not this earthly body.
He compares this body to a perishable ‘seed’ that will be ‘raised imperishable’.
Historical Arguments for the resurrection of Jesus
Who moved the stone and other texts suggest the resuurection can be investigated 'proved'. e.g. eye witness testimony, failure of naturalistic explainations
Continuity - To resurrect this very body, God would need to ensure material continuity between the body that died and the one that is resurrected.
Body State - Whatever state our bodies are in when we die is what caused us to die, and so this problem would need to be fixed in order for us to continue to live.
You cannot resurrect a body in exactly the same state that caused it to die!
Same Body – Same Person: If my perishable body is ‘changed in a flash’ into an imperishable body, how is it the same body at all?
What age will my body be resurrected as?
Monism
Hick suggests that the body and the soul are one.
He rejects the idea that the soul survives the body at the point of death.
What lives after death is a replica or a duplicate.
Replica Theory
The replica comes to life in heaven as an exact copy of the person who lived and died on earth.
God creates this replica to live on after death.
Example – John Smith
Some philosophers
Offers a model consistent with 'materialism' and ife after death but does not claim to be true
Hick did not claim his view was true only that he was trying to show that life after dath was not logically impossible.
Stupported by NDEs and past lives stories
Hicks pluralist view on life after death is rejected by Christians – they only accept salvation through Jesus
There is no incentive to live a good life – you may as well be as sinful as you like if an afterlife in guaranteed
Is a replica really identical to an original? Are you really the same person if you have a replica body?
Conintuity of identity problem
Some philosophers
Some philosophers
Section A
Examine ideas about resurrection.
Assess the debate between Dualism and Monism.
Section B
3a Clarify the ideas illustrated in this passage about life after death.
3b Analyse the implications for life after death from this passage.e
Section C
4 Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of John Hick’s Replica Theory..